register

Sign in with Facebook

Sign in with Twitter

Create an account

Sharing Breast Milk: What’s Right For You?

breast pump_1

more articles

by James Akre
June 28, 2012

Since pre-history, mothers in need of human milk have relied on other mothers in their family and community with milk to spare and share. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF, the second-best feeding option, after breastfeeding, is breast milk expressed by a child’s own mother, followed by milk from a healthy wet-nurse or from a human-milk bank.

The Human Milk Banking Association of North America (HMBANA) acknowledges that its not-for-profit member banks—two in Canada and 11 in the U.S. serving a total population approaching 350 million— cannot satisfy even a quarter of the current demand for banked milk. Under the circumstances HMBANA rightly gives priority to sick and premature babies. But at $3–$6 an ounce, a week’s supply could cost as much as $750—something few parents can afford to pay even if banked milk were available.

“A growing awareness of the importance of breast milk for babies has accelerated the demand for human milk at a time when processed donor milk is scarce and costly,” says Amy Spangler, president of baby gooroo. “Intent on giving their babies what every baby needs most, mothers are bypassing milk banks and going directly to the supplier—other breastfeeding mothers with milk to spare.”

The milk-sharing debate
With the help of social media, mothers are increasingly aware that milk-sharing is a viable option for mothers who can’t breastfeed or obtain banked milk. Mothers of healthy babies who need milk are linking with other mothers willing to donate milk via chapters of two popular Facebook-based communities—Eats on Feets and Human Milk 4 Human Babies—operating in more than 50 countries.

These online communities allow donor mothers to share their milk, safely and ethically, in the belief that they and recipient mothers are capable of weighing the inherent benefits and risks and making informed decisions. This altruistic commerce-free exchange is grounded in the principle that all who are involved in milk sharing take full responsibility for their actions and subsequent outcomes.

However, the position staked out by some public health authorities, notably in Canada, France, Israel, and the U.S., including the Canadian Paediatric Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics is clear: Don’t do it!

Some in the health and medical establishment regard internet-based sharing as a threat both to their authority and to public health. They reject a system that operates outside their influence, that can’t be regulated, and where mothers alone exercise control. Some especially anxious observers go so far as to allege that mother-to-mother milk sharing undermines the ability of the few under-provisioned human-milk banks to meet the urgent needs of sick and preterm babies, by further reducing potential milk donations.

It should be noted that donor mothers have been breastfeeding their own children. With few exceptions, these mothers and their children are being followed closely by health care professionals with all that this implies for health status monitoring; and they are ready to discuss their lifestyle and disclose their medical records before sharing their milk. And yet health authorities are contending that mother-to-mother milk sharing is fundamentally riskier than feeding infant formula, and that it’s impossible for mothers, acting on their own, to minimize health risks.

Those in favor of milk sharing disagree.

Weighing and managing relative risk
Milk banks function according to a strict medical model where regulations, rules, and protocol determine what is done, when, and for whom. Babies receiving banked donor milk are virtually always sick and hospitalized; healthy children seldom qualify for access to the limited amount of banked milk. Health professionals prescribe milk for the sickest, neediest, and most fragile babies, who are frequently immuno-compromised and risk death.

In addition, the screening criteria that milk banks typically apply disqualify many otherwise healthy women who might be willing to donate their milk. Exclusion criteria include previous residence in the UK (due to possible infection with mad cow disease), regular consumption of caffeinated beverages, a baby older than 6 months of age, and a small amount of available milk.

In contrast, milk sharing takes place in the community where interpersonal contact plays a significant role. Typically, the personalities and values of those involved are largely responsible for influencing decisions; the children concerned are healthy; and mothers are motivated by a heightened awareness of the importance of human milk for human babies and a desire to contribute to the common good.

There are risks associated with milk sharing just as there are with feeding babies formula.

It is thus a question of weighing and managing relative risk, minimizing potential harm, and maximizing benefit. Rather than resisting and dismissing milk sharing, the constructive approach would be for health authorities and health care professionals to engage with mothers in ways that help make the practice as safe as possible, such as providing reliable information on donor screening, milk collection, storage, pasteurization, and feeding practices, and expediting voluntary sharing of medical records.

There are encouraging signs of a more nuanced attitude among health professionals. For example, based on their survey of more than 400 health professionals, two researchers from the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health in 2010 concluded that those knowledgeable about breastfeeding overwhelmingly support wet-nursing and sharing of unpasteurized human milk. The majority of those surveyed recommended that donors should be screened like blood donors, and should be instructed on safe milk handling and storage techniques. Although health professionals view all infants as possible candidates for unpasteurized donor human milk, concerns remain about safety and social problems with wet-nursing and milk sharing. Lastly, survey participants agreed that professional recommendations should be developed to optimize safety and acceptance of wet-nursing and human-milk sharing.

What the milk-sharing community advises
The Four pillars to support the safe sharing of breast milk from Eats on Feets stress:

  • Informed Choice—Mothers are responsible for understanding the options, including the risks and benefits, of all infant and child feeding methods.
  • Donor Screening—Mothers can communicate with donors by asking questions about their health and lifestyle, and by requesting blood screening test results.
  • Safe Handling—Mothers and donors should handle milk with clean hands and equipment and use proper storage methods.
  • Home pasteurization—If in doubt, mothers can pasteurize milk at home: on the stovetop in order to inactivate HIV; or using a single bottle pasteurizer that performs the Holder method of pasteurization.

Meanwhile, Human Milk 4 Human Babies stresses that, “It is in the spirit of informed choice that milk sharing on these [Internet] pages will occur, and all people posting here will take complete responsibility for the outcome of milk sharing.” It also reminds mothers that:

Full disclosure reduces risk. Suggested points of discussion can include medications, alcohol and drug use. In many countries, testing for infectious diseases is done during routine prenatal/antenatal care. You may be able to consult a health care provider to obtain further testing if desired … You can ask for copies of those test results. If you cannot get a complete picture of the health of your donor, one option is to look into at-home pasteurization.

Mother-to-mother human-milk sharing is here to stay. Though technology has transformed the practice, it remains fundamentally identical to what mothers of good will have been doing since pre-history on behalf of other mothers and their babies.

Not-for-profit human-milk banks and commerce-free mother-to-mother milk sharing can and should operate on parallel non-competitive tracks. They are complementary, not antagonistic. Indeed, there is significant untapped potential for both systems to play mutually supportive roles in pursuit of a single common objective—helping to ensure that no babies are denied their nutritional birthright.

For more commentary by James Akre on mother-to-mother human-milk sharing, click here and here.

James Akre is an author and commentator interested in the sociocultural dimension of the universal biological norm for feeding infants and young children, and in identifying pathways for ensuring that breastfeeding and breast-milk feeding become routine once more. He lives in Geneva, Switzerland.

Photo ©iStockphoto.com

  • http://twitter.com/nleeguitar Nikki Lee

    At a recent gathering of lactation workers, half of them had personally either shared their own milk with another mother, or nursed another mother’s baby. Interesting. This topic taps into the primal roots of survival that lie in each of us.

  • C.P.

    I have been receiving donor milk for my 7 month old for 3 months now due to medications I had to start when she was 3 months old. My daughter is doing so much better than she was when we tried formula. I am happy and feel fulfilled to be able to give her the nutrition she needs and wants. My Pediatrician supports my decision to engage in informed milksharing 110%.

    Northern California

  • AimeeLC

    As an IBCLC who is frequently asked about milk sharing, I am so grateful to have this article as a balanced, non-hysterical analysis of the practice. I especially appreciate the common-sense recognition that this phenomenon is as old as time and is motivated out of the love and concern that breastfeeding mothers feel for other mothers and their babies. I’m proud of the women around the world who are exercising their rights of informed consent and self-determination, refusing to be cowed by the same medical establishment that perpetuates its costly failure to speak the truth regarding the real risks versus benefits of human babies not receiving human milk.

  • Taterbug998@comcast.net

    As a donor for the second time in 4 years…I feel that milk sharing is great. The donor needs to open to questions regarding health & lifestyle. As a donor I feel that is a great gift to a little one dor a healthy start in life. I tried to donate to the milk banks with no success..it was a hassle. If they are in such need they should make it easier to donate. I feel great to know that my extra milk is helping another baby!

  • Kandy906

    *wet nurse looking for a job* :)

  • Hockeychic815

    How do you donate milk through milk banks? With my first child I felt like I had enough to feed hhundreds of babies!

    • http://babygooroo.com baby gooroo

      The Human Milk Banking Association of North America has a website [https://www.hmbana.org/] where you can get information on how to become a donor.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Shelly-Birger-Phillips/1492328489 Shelly Birger Phillips

      I hear it’s a somewhat involved process. You have to fill out some forms. There are strict policies about prescription drugs that are allowed and those that are not. Depending on where you are the process will differ. Some places might even test your milk. But once you’re in the system I’ve heard it’s fairly easy to continue to donate. I think they only allow donations from moms whose babies are under one year old because the composition of the milk changes as children get older and newborn babies need newborn milk (or as close as they can get to it). I would contact your local hospital to ask about information about the nearest milk bank. :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Shelly-Birger-Phillips/1492328489 Shelly Birger Phillips

    When my milk took 12 days to come in, my healthy newborn survived on donated milk for her first two weeks of life. We got our milk from a neighbor who I met through a mutual friend (who is a doula). My daughter nursed from me and we gave breast milk through a syringe and tube. I needed about six hands to manage it all, but I am SO GRATEFUL that we weren’t forced to use cow’s milk formula. We don’t even have a local milk bank so we would have had to order from Portland or Northern California (we’re in Bend, OR). Loved this article. Happy World Breastfeeding Week!

  • Lise

    I donated over 1000 oz to a friend who couldn’t nurse (due to cancer). Her baby girl thrived on my milk and I was so glad to do it.

  • Heather

    I donated milk to a stranger who had adopted a little girl from birth and who did not have success with nursing. Now we’re friends! This time round I realize how much my ‘oversupply’ issue was affecting my baby so I’ve avoided pumping. May start again now that he is 6 months old.

  • Lykaios

    I donated milk to another mommy a while back. We friended each other on facebook after we met up and I still keep up with how her little girls are growing! I always had too much milk but a short time after I donated my stash I stopped working (to stay home with my son while my husband left for basic training) and pumping now my body will not react to the pump.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001891577700 Janet D. Akkerhuis

    I have milk to spare but I don’t know how or where to begin sharing and or banking it. I live near Springfield, MO but rarely go there do to gas prices and vehicle issues.

    • http://babygooroo.com baby gooroo

      Janet, I think the Heart of America Mothers Milk Bank at Saint Luke’s Hospital, 4401 Wornail Road, Kansas City, MO is the nearest milk bank to you. For more information on how to donate your spare milk please contact them by email: kcmilkbank@saint-lukes.org or by phone: 816.932.4888. Good luck!

  • Bugs

    An excellent article looking at all the issues. Thank you.