register

Sign in with Facebook

Sign in with Twitter

Create an account

“Good Start” Not Good For Breastfeeding

Gerber ad

more articles

by Heidi Green
May 10, 2012

It may seem odd that less than half of Gerber’s new 30-second ad for its Good Start infant formula actually talks about the product. After all, 30 seconds isn’t so long. Shouldn’t the company use every last moment to tout the benefits of the product it’s shilling?

So you might think.

But formula companies these days are up against a formidable alternative: breastfeeding. The benefits of breastfeeding for mothers and babies—and, along with that, the high cost of not breastfeeding—are widely recognized.

What’s more Nestlé, Gerber’s parent company since 2007, has been charged with marketing strategies designed to undercut breastfeeding at the expense of infant health. Positioning itself as the breastfeeding moms’ best friend is an attempt to overcome its troubled past. Thus, the company has rebranded its “Nestlé Good Start” label with the smiling Gerber baby, developed a series of videos about “how to nourish Generation Healthy through the milestones,” (more about that in a minute) and launched its new feel-good marketing campaign.

But there’s nothing to feel good about with this advertisement. Beyond the adorable baby and the mother’s gentle touch, this ad has nothing to offer the breastfeeding mothers who are its intended audience. “You want your baby to have your imagination, your smile, your eyes … not your allergies,” it declares. After acknowledging that “breastfeeding is the best way to naturally protect your baby” from this danger, it gets to the heart of its message: “If you do introduce formula, choose the Gerber Good Start Comfort Proteins advantage.” Such statements are well-recognized as “booby traps” to breastfeeding.

According to the ad, this formula is “inspired by breast milk” and produced by a company that is “nourishing” what it calls “Generation Healthy.” But what it isn’t—and cannot be—is a replacement for breastfeeding.

And while the final screen promises “expert feeding advice 24/7,” it seems best to remember that this company has at its heart one goal: selling formula, and, after that, a line of complementary foods.

Simply put, breastfeeding promotion is not the job of a company whose products compete with breast milk. Nor should it be. The company’s marketing bias cannot help but affect its advice.

Take, for example, Gerber’s video series, mentioned above. The first video promises to cover “all about breastfeeding,” a tall order indeed for just over 10 minutes of screen-time. The advice here is generally sound, given by a self-described breastfeeding mother named Francesca as she guides her friend through using several breastfeeding positions with her newborn. However, while Francesca notes that the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends mothers breastfeed for at least a year or as long as the mother and baby want, she ignores the group’s call for exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months.

The second video tackles pumping and storing milk, perplexingly recommending that mothers stop pumping when their breasts are “somewhat emptied,” rather than fully emptied. The third video turns to bottle-feeding and bottle care and by this video, Francesca is no longer said to be breastfeeding. The fourth is about “choosing a formula for your baby,” which Francesca explains she did when she decided to supplement her breast milk. The “milestones” the series is designed to address, then, are a short period of breastfeeding followed by supplemented feeding (or, the company’s narrator points out, exclusive formula-feeding), and then the introduction of complementary foods. The implicit message? We’re here for you when you give up breastfeeding—which you will.

We recognize that some women choose never to breastfeed and that only 1 in 10 U.S. mothers breastfeed exclusively for six months. But it is disingenuous, at best, for formula companies to promote breastfeeding, knowing that they profit only when mothers choose not to breastfeed.

While Gerber might promise that its “experts are here to help,” breastfeeding mothers are best advised to get their help elsewhere. Talk with your health care provider or a lactation consultant about the breastfeeding resources in your area. La Leche League has trained leaders available to answer questions in many areas, and breastfeeding counselors from the newly-minted Breastfeeding USA may be able to help with breastfeeding questions and concerns.

When it comes to breastfeeding, don’t look to Gerber for a “good start.”

  • Susan Johnson

    Thank you for addressing a problem that grows more insidious every year. After years of hearing the disingenuous notion that there might be an “advantage” to breastfeeding, we are told there is an “advantage” to Gerber artificial milk. Too many parents and others see these promotions as a helping hand to overwhelmed parents, wooed by the nod to breastfeeding. If companies were compelled to state that breastfeeding and human milk are normal, manufactured powders are artificial substitutes, we might take a giant ethical step forward in achieving a normal start for all our babies.

  • DedeCLC

    Breastfeeding is a public heath issue. Can we do better for the next generation and give them a healthier start? I believe that we can!

  • Michelle

    Thanks for bringing this conflict to the attention of mothers – we need more critical assessment of what Gerber/Nestle is really selling to parents.

  • Maria

    Thank you so much for this post – parents need this information bc they have been kept in the dark too long- trusting the wrong people! Not that this misleading info isn’t bad enough but Nestle’s newest scheme is sponsoring city programs targeted at reducing childhood obesity! Absurd! Mayor Cory Booker of Newark NJ fell for it accepting a $100,000 check securing Nestle (Gerber’s) branding of the program. This is the pilot program which Nestle plans to march across the US and the rest of the world – it must be stopped! See online petition, “Stop Newark/Nestle Now!” http://www.change.org/petitions/mayor-cory-booker-newark-new-jersey-usa-stop-the-hypocritical-newarknestle-campaign-to-target-childhood-obesity?share_id=HDVyjOmNmk&;.
    Since hospitals are trying to remove gift bags from their maternity units the formula companies will find other ways to peddle their products just like the tobacco industry does – very similar marketing scheme. My guest blog on Mothering.com gives a comprehensive picture of Nestle’s newest marketing tactic- scary!
    http://mothering.com/all-things-mothering/take-action/news/newark-and-nestle-partnership-theres-nothing-sweet-about-it

  • Rtucker

    Well, done, thanks! Rowena

  • Janet

    Well explained thank you

  • Rachelle

    Thank you for this post. Money speaks louder then anything in this situation. There are no financial benefits to providing support for something (breastfeeding) that takes away from their bottom line. As consumers we really need to be aware of what large corporations are “telling/selling” us – it pays to be aware of what their motivation is!!

  • Jessica.RD

    Very well written article, really appreciate a good look at what corporations alternate agendas are!

  • Raini1

    Thank you for this thoughtful article. We need this information to reach all the public to help them make an informed decision

  • Margot

    This is comical. I don’t really know any breastfeeding mother who would go to a Gerber website for breastfeeding advice. I think most women who struggle with breastfeeding and seek help, generally look to lactation consultants. I had two visits by a L.C.just while in the hospital, post delivery. The vast majority of new moms know the benefits of breast milk. This is a great article to further make formula companies the villain, but it verges on insulting to imply that breastfeeding women are getting their help and information from the Gerber website.

  • Lee

    If I would never feed artificial foods to my dinner guests, why would I feed artificial baby milk (aka formula or ABM) to my baby? It is something that is concocted in a factory, of substances that I frequently can’t even pronounce, that smells so bad that when you open the container you want to run and puke, that causes morbidity and mortality, that is missing many of the ingredients of breastmilk that are essential for the best health and brain development of the baby, etc., etc., etc..
    Let’s be honest and admit that MOST women who use ABM do it because of their own selfish motives…not because they think it’s good for the baby. Even the very small number of women who cannot breastfeed can obtain human milk in some other way. Those women do not feel guilty; they feel sad that they could not breastfeed. The ones who can and choose not to are the ones who feel guilty because they can and won’t.
    Some babies have trouble breastfeeding because they got off to a rough start. If their moms would receive more help to overcome their problems, they would be happy. It is possible but most women do not get that help and many do not even realize it is out there.

blog comments powered by Disqus